“The best and most groundbreaking film
since Jurassic Park”
There can’t be
a human being alive who isn’t familiar with Planet of the Apes, whether it’s the classic 1968
original starring the late Charlton Heston and the late Roddy McDowall, along with its four sequels and 70’s TV spin-off, or
Tim Burton’s hugely-panned 2001 remake starring Mark Wahlberg and Helena Bonham
Carter, or now Rupert Wyatt/ Matt Reeves’ groundbreaking trilogy. Add to all of that the animated
series, the video games, the graphic novels and all the old-school cosplay that
has populated comic conventions the world over since the dawn of ape, and you
have a franchise that rivals the likes of Star
Wars and Star Trek, but one which
speaks to the audience on a deeper level with its commentary on our society as
well as our treatment of primates not so deep within its subtext.
The original film
was based loosely on Pierre Boulle’s 1963 French novel La Planete des Singes, a sci-fi
fantasy in which a journalist joins a voyage to a distant planet where
speechless, animal-like humans are hunted and enslaved by a civilised society
of apes. The book was originally designed as nothing more than a commentary on man’s relationship
with ape as well as our own shortcomings and overreliance on technology, but quickly became a sci-fi hit. And this
satire is beautifully captured in the film and, along with the groundbreaking
use in prosthetic make-up, it became a juggernaut in the sci-fi genre
and an instant classic.
Many decades later, in 2001, Tim
Burton’s remake was released and while it was a box office hit, it was met with
much negative criticism. The film failed to wow audiences like the original did, but for
the most part it’s still a semi-fun sci-fi flick and at least honours the
original in more ways than some care to notice. Its prosthetics and set pieces are
undeniably awesome and there are even some eerie performances from Tim Roth and
the late Michael Clarke Duncan. Ultimately though the film failed to imprint on
cinema and became even more irrelevant in 2011 when another reboot landed.
The 1968 original broke new ground in its own way |
Tim Burton's vision didn't go down too well with many |
Rupert Wyatt's Rise of the Planet of the Apes was a huge financial hit and a success
amongst critics, praised not only for its storytelling and jaw-dropping CGI
motion-capture performances, but for its refreshing approach to the usually-unimaginative
reboot territory, which rightfully earns it the label “reimagining” instead, given
it’s set a long time before the idea
of a planet of apes. Its 2014 sequel Dawn
of the Planet of the Apes can even be considered superior in many ways, not
only for riskily jumping forward ten years, an admirable progression of the
narrative, but for delivering the most astounding special effects since the
dawn of cinema. But just when you thought it couldn’t get any better, Dawn director Matt Reeves returns for the second time to give us War for the Planet of the Apes, and the results are quite simply
breathtaking.
Set five years
on from Dawn, Caesar (Andy Serkis) and
his community are already at war with those damned dirty humans. Woody Harrelson plays the wicked Colonel who runs a military outpost that represents some of the last human survivors, all of whom are desperate
to wipe out the simians before Earth becomes a planet of apes. The pressure is on for the ape leader, who
decides to take the fight to them along with his loyal companions Maurice,
Rocket and Luca, and a young muted human girl. But as Caesar develops a deep
hatred towards men, he is haunted by visions of old adversary Koba whom he
fears becoming.
Much like Dawn, the apes here are startlingly realistic,
and rendered me totally slack-jawed throughout. The technology, courtesy of WETA, is just hard to wrap your head
around. In short, these characters do not
look computerised. From every single strand of hair that moves in the wind, or tears
that run down their wrinkled skin, all of their movements, or their humanity-filled
eyes, they are, for all intents and purposes, very real indeed. The
flawlessness here cannot be overstated. It’s also fair to say that this film
could mark the very pinnacle of CGI technology in cinema. How can it get better than this? Suddenly,
all of those jokes about James Cameron’s Avatar
looking like a Smurfs movie has some basis in reality. And whether Cameron’s
constantly-delayed sequel will pilot some new innovative viewing experience like
the now-popular VR or not (much like the original film pioneered 3D), he’s
already too late to the party - Wyatt and Reeves’ Apes
threequel has beat him to it. This is
revolutionary filmmaking, and while Avatar
remains visually striking, it still pales by comparison.
The Rise of Caesar |
A new dawn for Caesar and for filmmaking |
Caesar at war. |
War is also much less monotone than its (still brilliant)
predecessor, this time wielding more charm, quirkiness, heart, soul, humour and
drama, whilst aided by Michael Giacchino’s powerful and touching score. But this
is largely due to the fact that the film is told entirely from the point of
view of the apes, something the trilogy has been naturally and cleverly building
towards. And it’s the apes’ performances that are ultimately the most human of
all. Of course they’re played by incredibly talented mo-cap actors, but the
characters themselves are perhaps all that is truly left of humanity. And then
there’s Caesar himself – arguably the most bad-ass character in cinema - whose
screen presence is more powerful than ever, and his growing hatred towards humankind
palpable.
The best and
most groundbreaking film since my all-time favourite Jurassic Park, War for the Planet of the Apes, with its true sense
of timeless storytelling, is a soulful and flawless cinematic sci-fi masterpiece.
And like the 1968 original, there’s no doubt that it’s a film for the ages, one
that will be talked about and used as a benchmark in filmmaking for decades to come. Along with the Back to the
Future and Dark Knight trilogies,
the Apes trilogy is suddenly one of the
very best of all time. That said, there are rumours of a fourth film in the works. But while War seems like the perfect
ending, you can't help but feel that it's just the beginning; the dawn of a new
era in film, and perhaps one in which human beings are pretty scarce.
Always look forward to a performance from Woody Harrelson and a good ol' 'war' movie.
ReplyDeleteGreat review! Just hope it lives up to the hype ;-)
He's an incredible actor. I think he was wasted in The Hunger Games movies, but he is on top form here, and miraculously not out-done by the apes as the humans in the last film were. I don't think the hype could ever do this film justice. And I think it has more of a "western" feel to it. It's a fascinating film. For me, a masterpiece is the culmination of three achievements: excellent storytelling, art and pure entertainment. This film smashes all three boxes. It's the reason cinema was invented. Even if you don't end up liking it, you must go watch it!
ReplyDeleteI meant combination*!
Delete