I love Harry Potter. From the moment I watched
the first film I fell deeply in love with the insanely-rich, ingeniously-crafted
world and the incredible characters that occupy it. If you’re familiar with my
blog, you’ll know that I’m a huge Ghostbusters
fan, but given the choice between a proton pack and a wand, well, just call me
a traitor already. Hell, Jurassic Park
is my favourite film of all time, but I’d swap my ticket to Isla Nublar for an
enrolment letter to Hogwarts in a heartbeat. Have I made my point clear? I.
Love. Harry. Potter. So please bear that in mind as this review of Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald unfolds…
It would be easy and reasonable for one to have described 2016’s Harry Potter spin-off Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them as a prequel, but perhaps the term “spin-off” was a more fitting description. Yes, was. Bar a couple of nods and winks to the Wizarding World wonderfully established in the previous eight instalments, the film was its own beast (again, was). After all, not only is it set some seventy years before Harry even sets foot inside the Great Hall, it takes place in New York – an entirely new part of the magical world we’ve long since come to know and love.
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them kept the magic alive
But
no longer is any of this the case. Fantastic
Beasts and Where to Find Them is indeed, it seems, very much a prequel.
Perhaps that wasn’t the case while the film was being conjured up, but lest we
forget that not long after its release a further four instalments in this new franchise
were promised. And we should have known Warner Bros. and J.K. Rowling were up to no
good, because just two years later we already have Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, which stars Jude Law as a young Albus Dumbledore.
The
second entry in the new Beasts
franchise reunites Newt Scamander (Redmayne), the once-obliviated Jacob Kowalski (Fogler) - whose memories have miraculously returned with no explanation - Queenie (Sudol) and Tina Goldstein (Waterston) as they
attempt to thwart the maniacal Grindelwald (Depp) who plans to truly distance the magical world from the Nomaj (aka Muggles). We exchange the sunlit Manhattan
setting for a gloomy Parisian one a year after the first instalment as our characters desperately
try to locate Credence (Miller) – yes, the one who completely died at the
end of the first film - before Grindelwald does.
Contrivance - sorry, Credence
The 2016 blockbuster turned out to be just as magical as the best Harry Potter entries and offered a
fresh perspective on a world heavily-established in eight films and nearly a dozen
books (including spin-offs such as Quidditch
Through the Ages and, of course, Fantastic
Beasts and Where to Find Them). But the prospect of a sequel was a thrilling one only of sorts, as Fantastic Beasts felt far more "anthology" than it did "stepping stone" for the most part. Now, The Crimes of Grindelwald whisks us back into the whimsical Wizarding World. Unfortunately, though, while there's plenty of magic throughout, like Filch, this film is more Squib than spellbinding.
Thirty
minutes in, buckets of unnecessary exposition and countless references to the lore already weigh the film down. Beyond that there's no sense of structure, with the lines between the film’s beginning, middle and the end virtually non-existent. And the plot, a babbling and bubbling
cauldron of convoluted and incoherent nonsense. But perhaps the worst thing of all is
the film’s total lack of identity. Is this a sequel to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them? Not in its entirety, no.
Is it directly a prequel to the Harry Potter franchise?
Not while another three planned films currently stand in the way.
Yes, you'll need a Remembrall...
Echoes
of Star Wars: The Last Jedi flooded my mind
while watching this film, for many reasons besides ret-conning and dreadful character motivations. Much like that film, The Crimes of Grindelwald inexplicably damages some well-established
canon, throwing many things into question such as backstories, dates of birth, and worst of all, in-universe logic. But to draw a far more accurate Star
Wars parallel, this film is better compared to the prequel trilogy in that it’s terribly-contrived, with no real goal of its own other than to form as much connective tissue with the wider franchise as possible. The sad thing is it fails
to do even that properly.
It’s
tragic to say that there are no redeeming qualities here. There's also a lack of visual appeal and wonder, only made worse by the film's excruciating
pacing issues and infuriatingly-uneventful scenes.
And then there are the characters – the previously-beloved Jacob and Queenie are reduced
to shoehorned cameos-of-sorts whose presence in the film is both ineffective and
inconsequential, while Scamander himself has no real purpose, either, besides being a poor attempt to justify the film’s main title. Meanwhile, Depp does offer some delicious wickedness as Grindelwald, but much like Jude Law's charismatic Dumbledore, is barely onscreen.
It's as bleak as it looks...
Verdict: With underwhelming box office
openings and a wave of negative reviews from critics and even the most hardcore
Potter fans, this ugly beast is the criminal of the franchise. Perhaps, though, like magic, the damage is reversible. But for that to happen the mischief seriously needs to be managed, because the team behind this film were
clearly up to no good. In the meantime someone had better pass J.K. a Time-Turner...
Curious Rookie Rating: F
Not all hope is lost. We'll always have the Harry Potter films. In fact, here's my ranking of all the films (including both Fantastic Beasts entries) from best to worst:
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 2
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteHi, every time i used to check blog posts here early in the break of day, since i enjoy to find out more and more.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.idnsports.asia/
http://www.idnsbobet.org/
http://www.idnpokerindonesia.com/
http://www.idnfantan.com/
http://www.idnplay168.com/
http://www.idnpools.net/
http://www.idnplaypool.com/
This is a topic that's near to my heart... Many thanks! Exactly where are your contact details though?
ReplyDeletehttp://gamenembakikan.com/
http://gameikangratis.com/
http://www.mega888apk.net/
http://www.slotonlinemega888.com/
http://www.linkalternatifarenabet168.net/
http://www.daftarsbobet338a.net/
http://daftarjudiikan.com/
Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you really recognise what you're talking about! Bookmarked.
ReplyDelete